search results

(...) Hi, in case you have choose fields, which reference information from another workflow you should prevent the user from entering special characters. Example: A subworkflow is linked to a parent workflow with a choose field and uses the Title field as the display name. If a user enters ; or # in the value of the field, this will break the choose field logic. The system will be interpreted as a deli (...)

(...) I need to change 2 values with REST, I use'd API v3 and PATCH method. This values is in another workflow . JSON [ { "data": { "guid": "3567e810-6f44-41e5-9ac3-794d6e055db1", "value": "2024-05-27T14:02:26" }, "wynik": { "guid": "56e078eb-dc11-4960-a662-3974f0f837da", "value": "Ryzyko niskie" } } ] In other workflow history I have only infpo (...)

(...) Rzeczywista wartość to ProcessStage. ------------------------------------------------------- Ścieżka wywołania ------------------------------------------------------- w WebCon.workflow .Data.Extensions.DicWFFieldTypesExtensions.IsEditable(DicWFFieldTypes this) w WebCon.workflow .BusinessLogic.ExpressionTree.LeafTagRepository.ObjectIDFormFieldsPrefixRepository.ShouldGenerateSibl (...)

(...) rocess relies heavily on identifying the correct week number. Currently, they have to open Outlook to cross-reference week numbers with corresponding dates, which is time-consuming and disrupts their workflow . Feature Request: ISO Week Number Display: Include ISO week numbers (ISO-8601) in the date picker interface. This will allow users to quickly identify the week number alongside the date.

(...) Hi all! Maybe I didn't read the manual carefully and maybe this question has been asked many times before, but I am asking it anyway ;-) Is there a way in Webcon BPS Portal to start a workflow with anonymous access (without authentication)? What we need here is some kind of public form for new registration of users. This form also should have path authorization, to verify a new registered user (e (...)

(...) Hey, I am creating a workflow where I would like to give option [Send Back for LEGAL Check] on different steps (Screen shot added ). However, I want to create a restriction so on the legal check step users can see only paths related to the step that it came from. Not all paths because that would be extremely confusing (screenshot of all paths added). So for clarification if the flow was send to "legal (...)

(...) not bused at all. My suggestion would be to provide an plugin/extension for the existing "send mail actions". Provided options of the plugin: - Current information of the context like, process, workflow instance, recipients, settings etc. Basically everything which is configured in the custom notification but not only for this but also for the "send standard notification" action. - Option to declar (...)

(...) version 2023.1.3.202 (from 2023.1.3.169) I noticed that there are errors in mail sending report. E-mails are delivered but log is filling up with error. Error: "Failed to save information in the workflow instance history about the successful email sending execution" Error details: "Unrecognized Guid format." Attached screenshot with it. In history there is only information about adding e-mail (...)

(...) Hello all, I have a use case where for a parent workflow (let's say order) I'm starting many child workflow s (suborders). There are some details which i don't want to duplicate on suborders like 'customer' for example - it should be stored only on order, but not on suborders. In the reports i have one report for orders, second one for suborders - on suborders I'm able to show 'customer' using custo (...)

(...) ly the same ;) https://community.webcon.com/forum/thread/4134?messageid=4134 Hello, when working with custom columns in reports I'm always trying to avoid using regular ID when comparing forms, workflow s, processes etc. I'm almost always joining with specific tables to get GUID, so reports won't break between environments. Inside custom columns we can access wfelems, which as far as i know is bas (...)

(...) ns qualified electronic signature SMS authentication and Unlock document by SMS are impossible for me to configure, what ever I do (even just adding form fields to configuration), I get: WebCon.workflow .SDK.Exceptions.SDKKeyNotFoundException: Specified id:280 does not exist at WebCon.workflow .SDK.Documents.Model.Base.ReadOnlyItemsCollection`1.GetByID(Int32 id) at WebCon.BpsExt.Signing.Autent (...)

(...) Hi, I am currently working on some tool management workflow in WEBCON and I have a problem. I have an items list with REST API as data source where user can pick and book tools for some time period. Time period property is not included in REST API so I'm using form fields for booking dates. Then I need to filter the items list using tools from REST API and dates from WEBCON database to exclude unavailable (...)

(...) s issue? We have already set the TCP inbound rule to 8002. The system time is correct. OS: Windows Server 2016 1607 build 14393.7070 windows service log: Faulting application name: WebCon.workflow .Service.exe, version: 2023.1.3.202, time stamp: 0x8e09a86d Faulting module name: ntdll.dll, version: 10.0.14393.7070, time stamp: 0x666269e8 Exception code: 0xc0000028 Fault offset: 0x00000000000a (...)

(...) e immediately requests for a second improved version. :) - Additional widget type 'Text', which will output any text and not only numbers. For example to display information like "open/closed" sub workflow s: 2/4. - A form rule can be executed what should happen when the user clicks on it. We could display a tab for example or execute a hyperlink or whatever. - A form rule to trigger the refresh of th (...)

(...) K_WFElementDatails_WFD". The conflict occurred in database "BPS_Content", table "dbo.WFElements", column 'WFD_ID'. The statement has been terminated." I have exactly same button configured in other workflow in the same application and it works fine. It is irrelevant what hyperlink I try to open, I also tried to remove the button and action and configure new one from scratch - same story. In the diagnos (...)

(...) Hello all, I have a process that can be started either from a Parent workflow or in the workflow , using a menu option (creating a sub-task). In the start step, I have editability rules, if the user is creating a sub-task, some fields can be edited, but if the task has come from another process, those fields cannot be changed. In the URL, I'm passing the ID when the user creates a sub-task to a fiel (...)

(...) ualifications for people. Then I have another process [2] in which qualifications are also entered and when the step is exited, the data from process [2] should be entered into process [1] via a subworkflow . The data that comes from process [2] is in an item list and should all be entered individually (as separate instances) into process [1]. Before this, however, a query should be made as to whether (...)

(...) Hi everyone, I have a process which updates the group members. This is done in async mode because the synchronization takes a while. I'm trying to prevent updates by moving the workflow to a step which checks whether the synchronization is finished. As far as I found out so far a job get's added to the [UserSynchronizationQueueItems] of the current content database and it maybe get's deleted when t (...)

(...) Error code: 100 Thread was being aborted. at WebCon.workflow .Actions.Engine.ActionObject`1.d__9.MoveNext() at System.Runtime.CompilerServices.AsyncTaskMethodBuilder`1.Start[TStateMachine](TStateMachine& stateMachine) at WebCon.workflow .Actions.Engine.ActionObject`1.DispatchAsync() at WebCon.workflow .BusinessLogic.Automations.Engine.Evaluators.ActionEvaluator.d__23.MoveNext() Thread was (...)

(...) I have a workflow with a step that serves as an approval process. I assign one group and two individuals to this task. My goal is for both individuals to click confirm in this step, and only one person from the group (which contains several people) needs to do so. To summarize, I need to write the logic in a way that differentiates between the assigned individuals and the group, so that only one person fr (...)